Revision as of 10:35, 16 June 2012 edit Bonadea (talk \| contribs) Edit filter helpers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 157,648 edits Creating deletion discussion page for Keyscript. (TW)		Revision as of 10:57, 16 June 2012 edit undo Bonadea (talk \| contribs) Edit filter helpers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 157,648 edits m →Keyscript: linkfix Next edit →
Line 4: :{{la\|Keyscript}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keyscript\|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 June 16#{{anchorencode:Keyscript}}\|View log]]</noinclude>{{•}} <span class="plainlinks">[http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Keyscript Stats]</span>) :({{Find sources\|Keyscript}}) Contested PROD. Article about a writing system that does not appear to be notable. Please see [[Talk:Keyscript]] for the author's argumentation in favour of the article being kept, as well as a list of links to websites where Keyscript is mentioned. Unfortunately, none of the sites is a [[WP:RS\|reliable source]] ([[BOTW\|Best of the Web]] doesn't qualify I'm afraid), and only one of them ([http://www.cannedcrab.multiply.com/journal]) has more than a trivial mention of Keyscript, so the basic notability criterion of ''significant coverage in reliable independent sources'' (see [[WP:GNG]]) is not met. There is also no actual claim of notability per Wikipedia's definition in the article or in the reasoning on the talk page. That a number of people around the world have bought a product doesn't make the product notable. ''[[User:Bonadea\|bonadea]]'' <small>[[Special:Contributions/Bonadea\|contributions]] [[User talk:Bonadea\|talk]]</small> 10:35, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keyscript: Difference between revisions