Talk:Comparison of Java and C++: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 01:12, 1 July 2012

Revision as of 01:14, 19 August 2012

Line 12:

--- <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/190.175.146.75|190.175.146.75]] ([[User talk:190.175.146.75|talk]]) 11:32, 6 October 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

This article does not compare Java as programming language against C++. It compares Java + Java ByteCode + JVM against C++ + Native Assembler. Which is very stupid, since you can mix these anyway you want. For example you can run on other JVM's. You can compile Java code into native assembler code or C++ code into Java ByteCode. What's the point of this article? It's just wrong. If something, it should compare the languages. And for example for performance comparision, they both must be compiled into the same to be comparable.

Anonymous User:

I think the person who wrote it doesn't like java, by listing all the ways java is worse then c++, and not the other way around. Also, he put extra code, such as .clone() that is not needed.

--- <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/83.254.91.82|83.254.91.82]] ([[User talk:83.254.91.82|talk]]) 20:06, 1 May 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->