Revision as of 11:22, 3 July 2012 edit Gilderien (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 16,245 edits assess ← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:35, 14 March 2013 edit undo Jimw338 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 4,846 edits →Apple II copy-protection citation?: new section Next edit →
Line 123: :I don't see "von Neumann" anywhere in the article, but I think that the relationship is that the [[von Neumann architecture]] envisaged a computer with a single memory space comprising both data and instructions. Self-modifying code would require that a program be able to treat a piece of memory as data and then reach it as an instruction, and would not be possible on a non-von Neumann computer with, for example, separate code and data spaces. (Who is King John?) [[User:Spike-from-NH\|Spike-from-NH]] ([[User talk:Spike-from-NH\|talk]]) 00:26, 25 April 2012 (UTC) == Apple II copy-protection citation? == Does anyone know if there is a citation for the anecdote of using self-mod code as a copy protection technique on the Apple II? I remember reading about it somewhere 20 years ago when I was 'into' the Apple II in high school (back when "20 megabytes" was considered "really in-humanly humungously big" LOL) [[User:Jimw338\|Jimw338]] ([[User talk:Jimw338\|talk]]) 21:35, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Talk:Self-modifying code: Difference between revisions