Talk:Cantor's first set theory article/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
"contrary to what most mathematicians believe"
No edit summary
Line 53:
 
Those six words add nothing to the article but an unverified claim based on the personal experience of wikipedia editors. They're unencyclopedic language and not really appropriate. [[User:Night Gyr|Night Gyr]] 22:15, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
 
:As mentioned above, it's true that the claim hasn't been formally verified, though anecdotal evidence is strong. I don't see what's wrong with the language. How does removing this statement help our readers? [[User:AxelBoldt|AxelBoldt]] 00:20, 30 April 2006 (UTC)