Content deleted Content added
→Spam captions: new section |
→Recent reversions: new section |
||
Line 60:
Both of the images in the lead appear to be there purely to spam the creators. Is there content in the article that can used to explain why these were chosen instead of just advertising? -- [[User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom|<span style="color:red;;;">TRPoD <small>aka The Red Pen of Doom</small></span>]] 17:32, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
== Recent reversions ==
I have just undone an unsourced paragraph from another user who appears to have a potential conflict of interest related to Inview. I have also announced my own potential conflict of interest (related to AT&T) so I don't mean to step on any toes. However, I was following up on another editor (TheRedPenOfDoom) who performed similar reversions. At a minimum, content that states opinions about the difficulty of use or proper solution for EPG remote problems should be [[WP:V|sourced]]. When that is resolved we can talk about whether the proposed edits slant too much in any direction. Thank you for your understanding. [[Special:Contributions/12.153.112.21|12.153.112.21]] ([[User talk:12.153.112.21|talk]]) 17:39, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
| |||