Content deleted Content added
m Dating maintenance tags: {{Weasel-word}} |
→Physical applications: aha! a counterexample requiring 7 derivatives! |
||
Line 7:
==Physical applications==
The Cartan–Karlhede algorithm has important applications in [[general relativity]]. One reason for this is that the simpler notion of [[curvature invariant]]s fails to distinguish spacetimes as well as they distinguish [[Riemannian manifold]]s. This difference in behavior is due ultimately to the fact that spacetimes have isotropy subgroups which are subgroups of the [[Lorentz group]] SO<sup>+</sup>(3,'''R'''), which is a ''noncompact'' [[Lie group]], while four-dimensional Riemannian manifolds (i.e., with [[definite bilinear form|positive definite]] [[metric tensor]]), have isotropy groups which are subgroups of the [[compact group|compact]] Lie group SO(4).
There are known models of spacetime requiring as many as 7 covariant derivatives of the Riemann tensor.<ref>{{citation|first1=Robert|last1=Milson|first2=Nicos|last2=Pelavas|title=The type N Karlhede bound is sharp|journal=Class. Quantum Grav.|volume=25|year=2008|doi=10.1088/0264-9381/25/1/012001|arxiv=0710.0688}}</ref>. For certain special families of spacetime models, however, often far fewer often suffice. It is now known, for example, that
*at most two differentiations are required to compare any two Petrov '''D''' [[vacuum solution (general relativity)|vacuum solution]]s,
*at most three differentiations are required to compare any two perfect [[fluid solution]]s,
*at most one differentiation is required to compare any two [[null dust solution]]s.
==See also==
|