Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Web-Developer Server Suite: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Xanchester (talk | contribs) |
→MrOllie: Re MrOllie |
||
Line 73:
:::Okay, that's a good starting point. But I still feel that the suite lacks the "significant coverage" required to meet the GNG. Inclusion in a list doesn't necessarily mean it's notable (things are similar on Wikipedia—things which aren't considered "notable" can still be included on lists). With regards to your dissatisfaction with the GNG as a tool to assess notability for Web.Developer Server Suite, the only other guideline which might be applicable is [[Wikipedia:Notability (software)]] (although it's not really a "guideline" at all, just an essay). The criteria for inclusion are quite similar to the GNG, though. [[User:Chris the Paleontologist|<span style='font-family: "Verdana"; color:#c37a1c'>''CtP''</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Chris the Paleontologist|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Chris the Paleontologist|c]])</small> 22:12, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
::::The 'International Journal of Advancements in Technology' article includes a list of OSS projects at the end. According to the reference in that article, the list was copied from Wikipedia's [[List of free and open-source software packages]]. - [[User:MrOllie|MrOllie]] ([[User talk:MrOllie|talk]]) 01:08, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
:::::Hadn't even realized that. It ought to be disregarded completely, then. [[User:Chris the Paleontologist|<span style='font-family: "Verdana"; color:#c37a1c'>''CtP''</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Chris the Paleontologist|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Chris the Paleontologist|c]])</small> 11:32, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' clearly fails WP:GNG lacking WP:RS. aggressive [[WP:BLUDGEON]]ing does not advance notability. [[User:LibStar|LibStar]] ([[User talk:LibStar|talk]]) 23:31, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
| |||