Revision as of 17:16, 13 November 2012 edit Gene93k (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers 468,367 edits m AfD category: changed ? → O for Organisation, corporation, or product ← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:17, 13 November 2012 edit undo Gene93k (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers 468,367 edits m Listing on WP:DELSORT under Software Next edit →
Line 78: '''Delete''' - no evidence of [[WP:N\|notability]]; not even close to enough significant coverage in [[WP:RS\|reliable sources]] to establish that this product is notable. An attempt to include '''Notability''' as an in-article sub-heading to answer talk-page / AFD criticism is a pretty good indication that the product struggles to establish notability against [[WP:GNG]]. Though it's a [[WP:User essays\|user essay]], [[WP:NSOFT]] gives a pretty good idea of what the WP community would expect to see to establish notability in this particular case. Also agree with the above - the bludgeoning and [[WP:NPA\|personal attacks]] are uncalled for. Try to keep it [[WP:CIV\|civilised]]. [[User: Stalwart111\|'''Stalwart''']][[User talk:Stalwart111\|'''<font color="green">111</font>''']] 00:37, 13 November 2012 (UTC) '''Delete'''. Only citation is one that cites Wikipedia as a reference for the trivial mention. No indication that the software is notable, as demonstrated by the lack of significant coverage in sources.--[[User:Xanchester\|<font color="#87A96B">'''xanchester'''</font>]] [[User talk:Xanchester\|<font color="#A40000">('''t''')</font>]] 06:07, 13 November 2012 (UTC) :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software\|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k\|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k\|talk]]) 17:17, 13 November 2012 (UTC)</small>

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Web-Developer Server Suite: Difference between revisions