Content deleted Content added
Line 61:
[[User:BCG999|BCG999]] ([[User talk:BCG999|talk]]) 20:46, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
:I don’t understand the suggestion. Functions are not transitive. What do you mean by a transitive relativity?—[[User:EmilJ|Emil]] [[User talk:EmilJ|J.]] 13:05, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
::{{In5}}Sorry; I should have been more clear in stating my original suggestion. I was [[Wikipedia:Reference desk/Mathematics#January 15th#Trouble Reading an Article|having trouble reading this article's section on functions]] because some of the notation used in their description seemed confusing. This prompted me to ask about it at the [[Wikipedia:Reference desk/Mathematics|Mathematics Reference Desk]] in an ongoing discussion that you may join if you wish. I think that the people who responded to my initial post fixed any outstanding problems, but I still wanted to suggest that the first instance of this confusing notation, <math>\forall x,y,z\,(x F y \wedge x F z \rightarrow y=z)</math>, be revised to reference the fact that a similar notation had already been used in [[Implementation of mathematics in set theory#Properties and kinds of relations|the previous section]] to denote [[Transitive relation|transitive relations]]. I just wanted to know if it would be appropriate to rid the article of the confusion caused by this kind of redundancy.
::Thanks for listening,
::{{In5}}[[User:BCG999|BCG999]] ([[User talk:BCG999|talk]]) 18:19, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
| |||