Implementation of mathematics in set theory: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m Related definitions: Attempted to fix some LaTeX math
Operations on indexed families of sets: I believe this is what this definition is supposed to say...
Line 265:
In this class of constructions it appears that [[ZFC]] has an advantage over [[New Foundations|NFU]]: though the constructions are clearly feasible in [[New Foundations|NFU]], they are more complicated than in ZFC for reasons having to do with stratification.
 
Throughout this section assume a type-level ordered pair. Define <math>(x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_n,x_{n+1})</math> as <math>(x_1,(x_2,\ldots,x_n))</math>. The definition of the general ''n''-tuple using the Kuratowski pair is trickier, as one needs to keep the types of all the projections the same, and the type displacement between the ''n''-tuple and its projections increases as ''n'' increases. Here, the ''n''-tuple has the same type as each of its projections.
 
General cartesian products are defined similarly: <math>A_1 \times A_2 \times \ldots \times A_n = A_1 \times (A_2 \times \ldots \times A_n)</math>