Revision as of 14:24, 27 February 2013 edit Osiris (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 1,379 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 01:56, 16 December 2013 edit undo MadScientistX11 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 4,453 edits →Smalltalk Next edit →
Line 106: Is a [[Smalltalk]] programming language image (such as in [[VisualWorks]]) an Object Database? [[User:Wlievens\|Wouter Lievens]] 10:54, 23 March 2006 (UTC) :I don't know about VisualWorks but I'll answer the general question. No, a Smalltalk environment or image is not an OODB. The Smalltalk objects only persist while the image is live. For an OODB you need to have real persistence, not just when the program is running but stored to a persistent storage mechanism that persists past the life of any one program and can be accessed simultaneously by multiple systems. It's possible that some Smalltalk products (e.g. Visualworks) may provide additional DB capabilities but just a vanilla Smalltalk environment is not a DB. [[User:MadScientistX11\|MadScientistX11]] ([[User talk:MadScientistX11\|talk]]) 01:56, 16 December 2013 (UTC) == Perhaps a minor issue ==

Talk:Object database: Difference between revisions