Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/User conduct disputes archive/Mintguy: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Kenneth Alan (talk | contribs) |
Kenneth Alan (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 29:
:: On other occasions, user's contributions to other sections of *.wikipedia.com have been quoted when their actions are questionable. Since the mailing list is clearly devoted to the topic of en.wikipedia.org, and you identified yourself in the email as "Mintguy" and discussed this RFC yourself, I consider it completely valid for comment, and it will not be removed without the consensus of other users signing the "Statement of dispute" section. -- [[User:Netoholic|Netoholic]] [[User talk:Netoholic|@]] 00:39, 27 Aug 2004 (UTC)
:::Ahem, yes Mintguy, if you are so adamant about taking every occasion to slam Wikipedia editors, then I expect no whining from you when it happens right back by an account of your own words. Either stop the whining or stop the attacks and wars-or both, which would be best. [[User:Kenneth Alan|Kenneth Alanson]] 01:16, 27 Aug 2004 (UTC)
==Shows up one awkwardness of the RfC procedure==
| |||