Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simple Declarative Language: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Mark viking (talk | contribs) →Simple Declarative Language: Delete, no secondary sources found |
Mark Arsten (talk | contribs) Relisting debate |
||
Line 2:
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|T}}
:{{la|Simple Declarative Language}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simple Declarative Language|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013
:({{Find sources|Simple Declarative Language}})
No evidence of notability through extensive coverage in multiple, independent reliable sources. A Google Scholar search for 'sdl "simple declarative language"' returns about a dozen hits, but most of these seem to be for other languages of the same name, and those that are for this particular SDL merely cite it rather than discuss it in detail. [[User:Psychonaut|Psychonaut]] ([[User talk:Psychonaut|talk]]) 13:10, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
Line 11:
*'''Delete''' I was unable to find any secondary sources for this topic. There are two articles on SDL at TechHui, but these are blogs by an author associated with the company that sponsors this data serialization format. There is a mention at O'Reiily, but this was just a short paragraph and not in depth. There are several language bindings/libraries for the format for Ruby, .Net and Java/Swing, but these are all sponsored by the company that sponsors this data format. That SDL exists and that the format is as the article claims is verifiable in the primary sources, but the topic does not meet notability standards either for general notability [[WP:GNG]] or software notability [[WP:NSOFT]]. SDL is worth a mention at [[Serialization#Serialization formats]], per [[WP:PRESERVE]]. But unless secondary sources are found, the article cannot stand. --[[User:Mark viking|Mark viking]] ([[User talk:Mark viking|talk]]) 18:01, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
<hr style="width:55%;" />
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br />
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten|talk]]) 00:26, 1 April 2013 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]
<hr style="width:55%;" />
| |||