Content deleted Content added
m use {{cite conference}} |
Niceguyedc (talk | contribs) m WPCleaner v1.27 - Repaired 1 link to disambiguation page - (You can help) - XMI / Fixed using WP:WCW - Reference before punctuation |
||
Line 64:
[[Colette Rolland]] (1999)<ref name="Rolland 1999" /> provides an example of a meta-process model which utilizes the instantiation and assembly technique. In the paper the approach is called “Multi-model view” and was applied on the CREWS-L’Ecritoire method. The CREWS-L’Ecritoire method represents a methodical approach for [[Requirements Engineering]], “the part of the IS development that involves investigating problems and requirements of the users community and developing a specification of the future system, the so-called conceptual schema.”.<ref name="Rolland 1993" /><ref name="Hagelstein 1988">{{cite journal | doi=10.1016/0950-7051(88)90031-7 | title=Declarative approach to information systems requirements | year=1988 | last1=Hagelstein | first1=J | journal=Knowledge-Based Systems | volume=1 | pages=211 | issue=4 }}</ref><ref name="Dubois 1989">{{cite journal | author=E. Dubois, J. Hagelstein, A. Rifaut | title= Formal Requirements Engineering with ERAE | journal= Philips Journal Research | volume= 43 | issue= 4 | year = 1989}}</ref>
Besides the CREWS-L’Ecritoire approach, the multi-model view has served as a basis for representing
:(a) the three other requirements engineering approaches developed within the CREWS project, Real World Scenes approach,<ref name="Haumer 1998">{{cite journal | doi=10.1109/32.738338 | title=Requirements elicitation and validation with real world scenes | year=1998 | last1=Haumer | first1=P. | last2=Pohl | first2=K. | last3=Weidenhaupt | first3=K. | journal=IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering | volume=24 | pages=1036 | issue=12}}</ref> SAVRE approach for scenario exceptions discovery,<ref name="Sutcliffe 1998">{{cite journal | doi=10.1109/32.738340 | title=Supporting scenario-based requirements engineering | year=1998 | last1=Sutcliffe | first1=A.G. | last2=Maiden | first2=N.A.M. | last3=Minocha | first3=S. | last4=Manuel | first4=D. | journal=IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering | volume=24 | pages=1072 | issue=12}}</ref> and the scenario animation approach <ref name="Dubois 1998">{{cite journal | author = E. Dubois, P. Heymans | title= Scenario-based techniques for supporting the elaboration and the validation of formal requirements | journal= Requirement Eng J | year= 1998 | volume = 3 | issue = 3–4 | pages=202–218 | doi = 10.1007/s007660050005}}</ref>
:(b) for integrating approaches<ref name="Ralyté 1999">{{cite book |author=J. Ralyté, C. Rolland, V. Plihon |chapter= Method enhancement by scenario based techniques | title=Proceedings of the 11th conference on advanced information systems engineering, Heidelberg, Germany |date=June 1999 |isbn=3-540-66157-3 |pages=103–118 |publisher=Springer-Verlag |___location=London |url=http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=646087.679900#}}</ref> one with the other and with the OOSE approach <ref name="Jacobson 1992">{{cite book|isbn=0-201-54435-0 | url=http://books.google.com/?id=A6lQAAAAMAAJ | title=Object-oriented software engineering: a use case driven approach | first=Ivar | last=Jacobson | year=1992 | publisher=ACM Press}}</ref>
Line 127:
[[File:meta-process-model.png|thumb|right|320px|Meta-process model of the CREWS-L’Ecritoire method <ref name="Rolland 1999" />]]
[[Colette Rolland]] describes the meta-model as follow
(Meta-intentions are in bold, meta-strategies in italic – in green in the map).
Line 317:
* [[Unified Modeling Language]]
* [[Vocabulary-based transformation]]
* [[XML Metadata Interchange|XMI]]
* [[XML transformation language]] (XTL)
{{multicol-end}}
| |||