Localization theorem: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m WPCleaner v1.26 - Repaired 1 link to disambiguation page - (You can help) - Interval
Added wl, removed red link for "fluid volume"
Line 1:
In [[mathematics]], particularly in [[integral calculus]], the '''localization theorem''' allows, under certain conditions, to infer the nullity of a [[function (mathematics)|function]] given only information about its [[continuity (mathematics)|continuity]] and the value of its integral.
 
Let {{math|<var>F</var>(<var>x</var>)}} be a [[real-valued function]] defined on some open [[interval (mathematics)|interval]] <var>Ω</var> of the [[real line]] that is [[Continuous function|continuous]] in <var>Ω</var>. Let <var>D</var> be an arbitrary subinterval contained in <var>Ω</var>. The theorem states the following implication:
 
: <math>\int\limits_D F(x) \, dx = 0 ~ \forall D \subset \Omega ~ \Rightarrow ~ F(x) = 0 ~ \forall x \in \Omega</math>
Line 8:
A simple proof is as follows: if there were a point <var>x</var><sub>0</sub> within <var>Ω</var> for which {{math|<var>F</var>(<var>x</var><sub>0</sub>) &ne; 0}}, then the continuity of {{math|<var>F</var>}} would require the existence of a [[neighborhood (mathematics)|neighborhood]] of <var>x</var><sub>0</sub> in which the value of {{math|<var>F</var>}} was nonzero, and in particular of the same sign than in <var>x</var><sub>0</sub>. Since such a neighborhood <var>N</var>, which can be taken to be arbitrarily small, must however be of a nonzero width on the real line, the integral of {{math|<var>F</var>}} over <var>N</var> would evaluate to a nonzero value. However, since <var>x</var><sub>0</sub> is part of the ''open'' set <var>Ω</var>, all neighborhoods of <var>x</var><sub>0</sub> smaller than the distance of <var>x</var><sub>0</sub> to the frontier of <var>Ω</var> are included within it, and so the integral of {{math|<var>F</var>}} over them must evaluate to zero. Having reached the contradiction that {{math|&int;<sub><var>N</var></sub><var>F</var>(<var>x</var>) <var>dx</var>}} must be both zero and nonzero, the initial hypothesis must be wrong, and thus there is no <var>x</var><sub>0</sub> in <var>Ω</var> for which {{math|<var>F</var>(<var>x</var><sub>0</sub>) &ne; 0}}.
 
The theorem is easily generalized to [[multivariate calculus|multivariate function]]s, replacing intervals with the more general concept of connected [[open setsset]]s, that is, [[Domain (mathematics)#Real and complex analysis|___domain]]s, and the original function with some {{math|<var>F</var>(<var>'''x'''</var>) : '''R'''<sup>''n''</sup>&rarr;'''R'''}}, with the constraints of continuity and nullity of its integral over any subdomain {{math|<var>D</var>&sub;<var>Ω</var>}}. The proof is completely analogous to the single variable case, and concludes with the impossibility of finding a point {{math|<var>'''x'''</var><sub>0</sub> &isin; <var>Ω</var>}} such that {{math|<var>F</var>(<var>'''x'''</var><sub>0</sub>) &ne; 0}}.
 
{{clear}}
==Example==
An example of the use of this theorem in physics is the law of [[conservation of mass]] for fluids, which states that the mass of any [[fluid volume]] must not change:
 
: <math>\int\limits_{V_f} \rho(\vec x, t) \, d\Omega = 0</math>