Content deleted Content added
Jan Hidders (talk | contribs) m yet another link |
No edit summary |
||
Line 182:
::* http://www.y2kind.com/ockhams_razor/
:: By the way, shouldn't it be pointed out that there is a strong and a weak interpretation of the razor? The strong interpretation is that the simpeler theories are more likely to be true and the weak interpretation is that it is just more practical to investigate the simpeler ones first. The former claim is, I believe, a metaphysical claim and the latter one is not and AFAIK the usual one in the common philosophy of science. -- [[User:Jan Hidders|Jan Hidders]] 13:15 Jan 3, 2003 (UTC)
:::It's quite clear that Ockham argued that religious beliefs could not be scientifically proven, but did he ever use the Law of Parsimony to do so?--[[User:Eloquence|Eloquence]]
| |||