Revision as of 08:02, 4 June 2013 edit Intgr (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers 32,266 edits →Leap seconds?: reply ← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:15, 17 November 2015 edit undo Scs (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 10,922 edits →time_t Next edit →
Line 27: : I don't understand what was wrong with the previous statement. <code>time_t</code> means ''"time since epoch"'' or ''"calendar time"'' in all contexts as per specification. The undefined thing is the format of the type, not what it represents. Thus since the previous definition doesn't specify anything about the format, it's still correct. [[User:1exec1\|1exec1]] ([[User talk:1exec1\|talk]]) 16:28, 23 November 2011 (UTC) :: There is no requirement in C that <tt>time_t</tt> be implemented as time since an epoch. ([[Posix]] requires this, but not C.) I've [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=C_date_and_time_functions&diff=691089863&oldid=667471187 updated several function descriptions] accordingly. —[[User:scs\|Steve Summit]] ([[User talk:scs\|talk]]) 16:14, 17 November 2015 (UTC) == Proposed rename ==

Talk:C date and time functions: Difference between revisions