Content deleted Content added
posses possess |
m WP:CHECKWIKI error fix for #64. Do general fixes if a problem exists. - using AWB (9239) |
||
Line 1:
Biomaterials exhibit various degrees of compatibility with the harsh environment within a living organism. They need to un-reactive chemically and physically with the body, as well as integrate when with tissue.<ref name=biomaterial>{{cite journal |doi=10.1007/BF00680113 |title=Biomaterials for abdominal wall hernia surgery and principles of their applications |year=1994 |last1=Amid |first1=P. K. |last2=Shulman |first2=A. G. |last3=Lichtenstein |first3=I. L. |last4=Hakakha |first4=M. |journal=Langenbecks Archiv für Chirurgie |volume=379 |issue=3 |pages=168–71}}</ref> The extent of compatibility varies based on the application and material required. Often modifications to the surface of a biomaterial system are required to maximize performance. The surface can be modified in many ways, including plasma modification and applying coatings to the substrate. Surface modifications can be used to affect [[
== Background of Polymer Biomaterials ==
=== Polytetrafluoroethylene (Teflon) ===
[[File:PTFE3.pdf|thumb|Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) is a thermoplastic that is used for its non-wetting properties and low friction.]]
[[polytetrafluoroethylene|Teflon]] is a hydrophobic polymer composed of a carbon chain saturated with fluorine atoms. The fluorine-carbon bond is largely ionic producing a strong dipole. The dipole prevents Teflon from being susceptible to Van der Waals forces, so other materials will not stick to the surface.
=== Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) ===
[[File:Polyetherketon.svg|thumb|Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is a thermoplastic, semicrystalline polymer. The backbone consists of ether, ketone, and benzene groups]]
[[
== Plasma modification of biomaterials ==
Line 35 ⟶ 33:
=== Surface Energy ===
The [[
<math> \gamma_{SV} - \gamma_{SL}= \gamma_{LV} cos\theta </math> <ref name=CA>{{cite book |doi=10.1021/ba-1964-0043.ch001 |chapter=Relation of the Equilibrium Contact Angle to Liquid and Solid Constitution |title=Contact Angle, Wettability, and Adhesion |series=Advances in Chemistry |year=1964 |last1=Zisman |first1=W. A. |isbn=0-8412-0044-0 |volume=43 |pages=1–51 |editor1-first=Frederick M. |editor1-last=Fowkes}}</ref>
Line 43 ⟶ 41:
=== Surface Functionalization ===
[[
[[File:Argon plasma used for polymer surface functionalization prior to bonding.Argon plasma used for polymer surface functionalization prior to bonding.png|125 × 240 pixels.0px|thumb|right|Argon plasma used for polymer surface functionalization prior to bonding.]]
Line 52 ⟶ 50:
==== Covalent Immobilization by Gas Plasma RF Glow Discharge ====
[[Polysaccharide
Covalent attachment to a substrate is necessary to immobilize polysaccharides, otherwise they will rapidly desorb in a biological environment. This can be a challenge due to the fact that the majority of biomaterials do not possess the surface properties to covalently attach polysaccharides. This can be achieved by the introduction of [[amine|amine groups]] by RF glow discharge plasma. Gases used to form amine groups, including ammonia or n-heptylamine vapor, can be used to deposit a thin film coating containing surface amines. Polysaccharides must also be activated by oxidation of anhydroglucopyranoside subunits. This can be completed with sodium metaperiodate (NaIO<sub>4</sub>). This reaction converts anhydroglucopyranoside subunits to cyclic hemiacetal structures, which can be reacted with amine groups to form a Schiff base linkage (a carbon-nitrogen double bond). These linkages are unstable and will easily [[dissociation (chemistry)|dissociate]]. Sodium cyanoborohydride (NaBH<sub>3</sub>CN) can be used as a stabilizer by reducing the linkages back to an amine.<ref name=immobilization>{{cite journal |doi=10.1002/(SICI)1096-9918(200001)29:1<46::AID-SIA692>3.0.CO;2-6 |title=Biomedical coatings by the covalent immobilization of polysaccharides onto gas-plasma-activated polymer surfaces |year=2000 |last1=Dai |first1=Liming |last2=Stjohn |first2=Heather A. W. |last3=Bi |first3=Jingjing |last4=Zientek |first4=Paul |last5=Chatelier |first5=Ronald C. |last6=Griesser |first6=Hans J. |journal=Surface and Interface Analysis |volume=29 |pages=46–55}}</ref>
Line 69 ⟶ 67:
=== Adhesion of Coatings ===
In general, the lower the surface tension of a liquid coating, the easier it will be to form a satisfactory wet film from it. The difference between the surface tension of a coating and the surface energy of a solid substrate to which a coating is applied affects how the liquid coating flows out over the substrate. It also affects the strength of the adhesive bond between the substrate and the dry film. If for instance, the surface tension of the coating is higher than the surface tension of the substrate, then the coating will not spread out and form a film. As the surface tension of the substrate is increased, it will reach a point to where the coating will successfully wet the substrate but have poor adhesion. Continuous increase in the coating surface tension will result in better wetting in film formation and better dry film adhesion.
More specifically whether a liquid coating will spread across a solid substrate can be determined from the surface energies of the involved materials by using the following equation:
<math> S = \gamma_{SA} + (\gamma_{CA} - \gamma_{SC}) </math><ref name=teflonse
Where S is the coefficient of spreading, <math> \gamma_{SA} </math> is the surface energy of the substrate in air, <math> \gamma_{CA} </math> is the surface energy of the liquid coating in air and <math> \gamma_{SC} </math> is the interfacial energy between the coating and the substrate. If S is positive the liquid will cover the surface and the coating will adhere well. If S is negative the coating will not completely cover the surface, producing poor adhesion.
Line 81 ⟶ 77:
==== Corrosion Protection ====
Organic coatings are a common way to protect a metallic substrate from [[
=== Guide Wires ===
Guide wires are an example of an application for biomedical coatings. Guide wires are used in [[percutaneous coronary intervention|coronary angioplasty]] to correct the effects of [[
==== Hydrophilic Coatings ====
Hydrophilic coatings can reduce friction in the arteries by up to 83% when compared to bare wires due to their high surface energy.<ref name=friction>{{cite journal |pmid=8485751 |year=1993 |last1=Schröder |first1=J |title=The mechanical properties of guidewires. Part III: Sliding friction |volume=16 |issue=2 |pages=93–7 |journal=Cardiovascular and interventional radiology |doi=10.1007/BF02602986}}</ref> When the hydrophilic coatings come into contact with bodily fluids they form a waxy surface texture that allows the wire to slide easily through the arteries. Guide wires with hydrophilic coatings have increased trackability and are not very thrombogenic; however the low coefficient of friction increases the risk of the wire slipping and perforating the artery.
==== Hydrophobic Coatings ====
Teflon and [[
==== Magnetic Resonance Compatible Guide Wires ====
Using an [[Magnetic Resonance Imaging|MRI]] to image the guide wire during use would have an advantage over using x-rays because the surrounding tissue can be examined while the guide wire is advanced. Because most guide wires' core materials are stainless steel they are not capable of being imaged with an MRI. Nitinol wires are not magnetic and could potentially be imaged, but in practice the conductive nitinol heats up under the magnetic radiation which would damage surrounding tissues. An alternative that is being examined is to replace contemporary guide wires with PEEK cores, coated with iron particle embedded synthetic polymers.
{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Material !! Surface Energy (mN/m)
|-
| Teflon || 24 <ref name=teflonse>{{cite web |url=http://www.vtcoatings.com/plastics.htm|title= Coating Plastics - Some Important Concepts from a Formulators Perspective |last1= Van Iseghem |first1= Lawrence |
|-
| Silicone || 22 <ref name=Siliconese>{{cite journal |doi=10.1021/la9906626 |title=Surface Modification of Silicone Elastomer Using Perfluorinated Ether |year=2000 |last1=Thanawala |first1=Shilpa K. |last2=Chaudhury |first2=Manoj K. |journal=Langmuir |volume=16 |issue=3 |pages=1256–60}}</ref>
Line 116 ⟶ 112:
{{Reflist}}
[[Category:Biology]]
▲{{cat improve|date=June 2013}}
|