Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/230 (number): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
+ My vote |
→[[230 (number)]]: Comment about prodder also being nominator |
||
Line 12:
*'''Keep both'''. Split the [[200 (number)]] article into 10 articles, one for each group of 10 in the range from 200-299. The 230 (number) article should cover the range 230-239 and the 240 (number) should cover the range 240-249. [[User:Georgia guy|Georgia guy]] 13:15, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep both'''. The fact that the same person who proposed deletion is the one who nominated for deletion is very bad form, in my opinion. If it was up to me this whole thing would be dismissed on those grounds alone. [[User:Robert Happelberg|Robert Happelberg]] 16:35, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
**'''Comment''' Why is it a problem that the person adding the prod tag also brought it here? [[Wikipedia:Proposed_deletion]] is clear that this is the procedure to follow. From the Conflicts section "Contested deletions: If anyone, including the article's creator, removes Template:Prod from an article for any reason, do not put it back. If you still believe the article needs to be deleted, list it on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion." [[User:ScottW|ScottW]] 16:47, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
| |||