Open Compute Project: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 19:35, 9 July 2013

Revision as of 19:41, 9 July 2013

Line 18:

*Server compute nodes, including one for [[Intel]] processors and one for [[AMD]] processors

*Open Vault storage building blocks offeringoffer high disk densities, with 30 drives in a 2U Open Rack chassis designed for easy [[disk drive]] replacement.

*A single voltage (12.5 VDC) power supply designed to work with 277 VAC input and 48 VDC battery backup

* Mechanical mounting system: Open racks have the same outside width (600 mm) and depth as standard [[19-inch rack]]s, but are designed to mount wider chassis with a 537mm width (about 21 inches). This allows more equipment to fit in the same volume and improves air flow. Compute chassis sizes are defined in multiples of an OpenU, which is 48mm, slightly larger than the typical [[rack unit]].

*Data center designs for energy efficiency, including 277 VAC power distribution that eliminates one transformer stage in typical data centers

*On May 8, 2013, an effort to define an open [[network switch]] was announced.<ref>{{Cite web |title= Up next for the Open Compute Project: The Network |date= May 8, 2013 |author= Jay Hauser for Frank Frankovsky |work= Open Compute blog |url= http://www.opencompute.org/2013/05/08/up-next-for-the-open-compute-project-the-network/ |accessdate= July 9, 2013 }}</ref> The plan was to allow Facebook to load its own [[operating system]] software onto the switch. Press reports predicted that more expensive and higher-performance switches would continue to be popular, while less expensive products treated more like a [[commodity]] (using the [[buzzword]] "top-of-rack") might adopt the proposal.<ref>{{Cite news |title= Can Open Compute change network switching? |author= David Chernicoff |work= ZDNet |date= May 9, 2013 |url= http://www.zdnet.com/can-open-compute-change-network-switching-7000015141/ |accessdate= July 9, 2013 }}</ref>

==References==