Revision as of 21:01, 21 July 2013 edit 68.173.113.106 (talk) →Page Is Irrelevent: Java is open... ← Previous edit		Revision as of 02:32, 14 August 2013 edit undo Evolvedmicrobe (talk \| contribs) 71 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 93: These are two proprietary products produced by competing corporations. Ignoring how C# isand anJava are open ~~standard~~standards, why would this matter? If there was an article on advertising strategies of Coca-Cola and Pepsi it would still be interesting and useful. Many of the details are volitile (sic) and the article will quickly go stale. Line 107: Admittedly, Britannica probably would not have this article. Britannica is also not as good as wikipedia. This article is a compendium recommending a lot of good information. People need to get things done with computers, C/Java/Python/C++/C#/Haskell are all ways to get stuff done, how do they compare? Many people have found this article useful. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Evolvedmicrobe\|Evolvedmicrobe]] ([[User talk:Evolvedmicrobe\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Evolvedmicrobe\|contribs]]) 21:42, 24 May 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> :Err... Java is an open standard. [[Special:Contributions/68.173.113.106\|68.173.113.106]] ([[User talk:68.173.113.106\|talk]]) 21:01, 21 July 2013 (UTC) (woops, sorry! I thought it was but the oracle google lawsuit made me wonder.

Talk:Comparison of C Sharp and Java: Difference between revisions