Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 19:
Components include:
* Server compute nodes included one for [[Intel]] processors and one for [[Advanced Micro Devices|AMD]] processors. In 2013, [[Calxeda]] contributed a design with [[ARM architecture]] processors.<ref>{{Cite web |title= ARM Server Motherboard Design for Open Vault Chassis Hardware v0.3 MB-draco-hesperides-0.3 |author= Tom Schnell |date= January 16, 2013 |url=http://www.opencompute.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Open_Compute_Project_ARM_Server_Specification_v0.3.pdf |accessdate= July 9, 2013 }}</ref>
* Open Vault storage building blocks offer high disk densities, with 30 drives in a 2U Open Rack chassis designed for easy [[disk drive]] replacement. The 3.5 inch disks are stored in two drawers, five across and three deep in each drawer, with connections via [[serial attached SCSI]].<ref>{{Cite web |title= Open Vault Storage Hardware V0.7 OR-draco-bueana-0.7 |author= Mike Yan and Jon Ehlen |date= January 16, 2013 |url= http://www.opencompute.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Open_Compute_Project_Open_Vault_Storage_Specification_v0.7.pdf |accessdate= July 9, 2013 }}</ref> Another design concept was contributed by Hyve Solutions, a division of [[Synnex]] in 2012.<ref>{{Cite web |title= Hyve Solutions Contributes Storage Design Concept to OCP Community |work= News release |date= January 17, 2013 |url= http://ir.synnex.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=733922 |accessdate= July 9, 2013 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title= Torpedo Design Concept Storage Server for Open Rack Hardware v0.3 ST-draco-chimera-0.3 |author= Conor Malone |date= January 15, 2012 |url= http://www.opencompute.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Open_Compute_Project_Storage_Server_for_Open_Rack_Specification_v0.3.pdf |accessdate= July 9, 2013 }}</ref>
* Mechanical mounting system: Open racks have the same outside width (600
* Data center designs for energy efficiency, include 277 VAC power distribution that eliminates one transformer stage in typical data centers. A single voltage (12.5 VDC) power supply designed to work with 277 VAC input and 48 VDC battery backup.<ref name="Stanford" />
* On May 8, 2013, an effort to define an open [[network switch]] was announced.<ref>{{Cite web |title= Up next for the Open Compute Project: The Network |date= May 8, 2013 |author= Jay Hauser for Frank Frankovsky |work= Open Compute blog |url= http://www.opencompute.org/2013/05/08/up-next-for-the-open-compute-project-the-network/ |accessdate= July 9, 2013 }}</ref> The plan was to allow Facebook to load its own [[operating system]] software onto the switch. Press reports predicted that more expensive and higher-performance switches would continue to be popular, while less expensive products treated more like a [[commodity]] (using the [[buzzword]] "top-of-rack") might adopt the proposal.<ref>{{Cite news |title= Can Open Compute change network switching? |author= David Chernicoff |work= ZDNet |date= May 9, 2013 |url= http://www.zdnet.com/can-open-compute-change-network-switching-7000015141/ |accessdate= July 9, 2013 }}</ref>
A similar project for a custom switch for the [[Google platform]] had been rumored, and evolved into the [[OpenFlow]] protocol.<ref>{{Cite news |title= Facebook Rattles Networking World With ‘Open Source’ Gear |date= May 8, 2013 |author= Cade Metz |work= Wired |url= http://www.wired.com/wiredenterprise/2013/05/facebook_networking/ |accessdate= July 9, 2013 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |title= Going With the Flow: Google’s Secret Switch to the Next Wave of Networking |date= April 17, 2012 |author= Steven Levy |work= Wired |url= http://www.wired.com/wiredenterprise/2012/04/going-with-the-flow-google/ |accessdate= July 9, 2013 }}</ref>
|