Talk:Final Fantasy IV/to do: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 16:26, 4 June 2006

Revision as of 16:30, 4 June 2006

Line 1:

*the use of weasel words and unclear quotation - called greatest game by whom? rephrase to be active/ considered by many.....make clear

*3 paragraph lead

*trim down plot, other sections that are growing for no reason

*expand reception section, only one paragraph, what did japanese reviewers think?/comparisons to Phantasy Star II/japanese gameboy version reception

*find back issues of independent game magazines from 1991, and whether critics' views of the unchanged aspects of the game (characters, story) have changed over 15 years. I stress "independent" because I wouldn't trust, say, Nintendo Power to give an objective review of Final Fantasy II, although such a source might provide insight on how the game was marketed.

*didn't one of the (recent) reviews compare the complexity of the plot of FFIV to that of Phantasy Star II? Direct comparisons to other games would be good to include.

*"Final Fantasy IV has been called one of the greatest video games of all time . . . ." Called by whom? Rephrase it as an active sentence to give more information about the source of that indirect quote.

*". . . and is considered by many to be the popularizer of many common computer role-playing game features." "Considered by many" is a phrase that should set off warning bells in a reader's mind. Rephrase it to say exactly who considers it to be such.

*"Development" section expansion. Influences? "Graphical Improvements" more technical stuff, memory on the cartidge versus other SNES games

*get some primary sources, replace bahamut reference

*was there a japanese re-release? how was it recieved?

*including reviews and opinions of the sound track alone. influences?

*What was different between Wonderswan color version and others?