Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interactive application security testing: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Mark Arsten (talk | contribs)
Relisting debate
Line 12:
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten|talk]]) 02:14, 26 September 2013 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]
<hr style="width:55%;" />
* '''Delete''' and agree, Wikipedia articles on related subjects could use some work. It was created by a single-purpose account that also tried to create an article on a company mentioned in this one: [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Quotium Technologies]], which would not disqualify it ''per se''. But this one has just too many issues with style being all out of place. Too many capital letters, no lead, raw urls for citations, dated language (" today’s date", "At this point of time", "at present" etc.) reads clearly like a marketing research report (e.g. [[solution]]s) not encyclopedia language. [[User:W Nowicki|W Nowicki]] ([[User talk:W Nowicki|talk]]) 22:55, 26 September 2013 (UTC)