Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interactive application security testing: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Interactive application security testing: ok, explicit |
|||
Line 16:
*'''Comment''' - I agree the article has problem (I've added an {{t|essay-like}} tag) but we don't delete flawed articles, we improve them. The AfD question here is about [[WP:N|notability]] and no one has addressed that question yet. ~[[user talk:Kvng|KvnG]] 15:12, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
::OK, to be explicit, this topic is not notable. Two citations are to a promotional page for a talk by Quotium, who appears to be the ones coining this neologism. Two are for a marketing report that is not available without purchase. One is short blog posting. One is a promotional brochure from Singapore (?) that quotes the same marketing report. Every new acronym invented by a marketer does not automatically get an article. [[User:W Nowicki|W Nowicki]] ([[User talk:W Nowicki|talk]]) 20:05, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
* '''Delete''' If this topic is truly notable, the article would have to be completely rewritten anyway to get rid of the OR and soapboxing. [[User:Qwertyus|Q<small>VVERTYVS</small>]] <small>([[User talk:Qwertyus|hm?]])</small> 14:19, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
| |||