Revision as of 08:22, 17 November 2013 edit Gryllida (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 8,315 edits Declining submission: Thanks for the writing, it... (AFCH) ← Previous edit		Revision as of 08:31, 17 November 2013 edit undo Gryllida (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 8,315 edits clarify Next edit →
Line 1: {{AFC submission\|d\|reason\|3=Thanks for the writing, it looks like the article subject more than qualifies for inclusion. This rejection is a formal step to ensure reviewer comments are read and followed. You can find them below this message.\|declinets=20131117082203\|decliner=Gryllida\|ts=20131018200040\|u=Fsixtyfour\|ns=5}} {{afc comment\|The article content seems to be OK, but there is a complete lack of referencing for anything but the history section. The article is mostly about modern image processing for particle analysis and it needs references to the approaches discussed. --[[User:Mark viking\|Mark viking]] ([[User talk:Mark viking\|talk]]) 16:05, 28 October 2013 (UTC)}}

Imaging particle analysis: Difference between revisions