Content deleted Content added
Jackmcbarn (talk | contribs) →Handle full URLs passed as pages to be edited: new section |
|||
Line 16:
::: Then where would the two tables be displayed? It would make more sense to me in that case to have one PER table but to color the template-protected rows differently (suggestions as to the coloring welcome). [[User:Anomie|Anomie]][[User talk:Anomie|⚔]] 20:29, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
::::Yep, color coding would work as well. Having two separate tables and transcluding them both to the category might be slightly more flexible, because template editors might choose to tranclude it to their userpage or whatnot. I don't really mind, both would be an improvement on the current situation. — Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]] · [[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 12:34, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
== Handle full URLs passed as pages to be edited ==
At [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gauhar_Khan&diff=584587005&oldid=584469730], a full URL was given as a page to edit instead of just a page name. Would it be simple to make this change the URL back into a page name, or otherwise handle it? Currently, it leads to things like [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:AnomieBOT/SPERTable&oldid=584592000] happening, which isn't very pretty or accurate. {{ping|Mr. Stradivarius}} ping. [[User:Jackmcbarn|Jackmcbarn]] ([[User talk:Jackmcbarn|talk]]) 22:57, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
| |||