Bayesian operational modal analysis: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Siukuiau (talk | contribs)
revised explanation of context; added references.
categorization/tagging using AWB
Line 1:
{{ref improverefimprove|date=December 2013}}
'''Bayesian Operational Modal Analysis''' (BAYOMA) adopts a [[Bayesian inference|Bayesian]] [[system identification]] approach for [[Operational Modal Analysis]] (OMA). [[Operational Modal Analysis]] (OMA) aims at identifying the modal properties ([[natural frequency|natural frequencies]], [[damping ratio|damping ratios]]s, [[mode shape|mode shapes]]s, etc) of a constructed structure using only its (output) vibration response (e.g., velocity, acceleration) measured under operating conditions. The (input) excitations to the structure are not measured but are assumed to be '[[Ambient Vibrations|ambient]]' ('broadband random'). In a Bayesian context, the set of modal parameters are viewed as uncertain parameters or random variables whose probability distribution is updated from the prior distribution (before data) to the posterior disribution (after data). The peak(s) of the posterior distribution represents the most probable value(s) ('''MPV''') suggested by the data, while the spread of the distribution around the MPV reflects the remaining uncertainty of the parameters.
 
==Pros and Cons==
Line 7:
The advantage of a [[Bayesian inference|Bayesian]] approach for OMA is that it provides a fundamental means via the Bayes' Theorem to process the information in the data for making statistical inference on the modal properties in a manner consistent with modeling assumptions and probability logic.
 
The potential disadvantage of Bayesian approach is that the theoretical formulation can be more involved and less intuitive than their non-Bayesian counterparts. Algorithms are needed for efficient computation of the statistics (e.g., mean and variance) of the modal parameters from the [[posterior distribution]].
 
==Methods==
Line 21:
|volume=16
|issue=3
|pages=219-231219–231
|doi=10.1016/S0266-8920(01)00004-2}}</ref> and in the [[frequency ___domain]] using the [[spectral density]] matrix<ref>
{{cite journal
Line 33:
|volume=30
|issue=
|pages=1103-11231103–1123
|doi=10.1002/eqe.53}}</ref> and [[FFT]] ([[Fast Fourier Transform]])<ref>
{{cite journal
Line 45:
|volume=6
|issue=2
|pages=81-9581–95
|doi=10.1260/136943303769013183}}</ref> of ambient vibration data. Based on the formulation for FFT data, fast algorithms have been developed for computing the posterior statistics of modal parameters.<ref>
{{cite journal
Line 57:
|volume=126
|issue=
|pages=3-143–14
|doi=10.1016/j.compstruc.2012.12.015
|url=}}</ref> The fundamental precision limit of OMA has been investigated and presented as a set of '''uncertainty laws'''.<ref>
Line 85:
|pages=
|doi=10.1016/j.ymssp.2013.07.017
|url=}}</ref>
 
==Notes==
Line 133:
|volume=21
|issue=
|pages=2359-23732359–2373
|doi=10.1016/j.ymssp.2006.11.007
|url=}}</ref>
Line 144:
*[[Modal analysis]]
*[[Modal testing]]
 
 
==References==
{{Reflist}}
 
{{Uncategorized|date=January 2014}}