Content deleted Content added
RevRagnarok (talk | contribs) Great plan. |
|||
Line 10:
How about this: move the BASIC section below the SQL section, and rename it as "other uses of the term" with something along the lines of "'User defined function' in some older programming languages was used to describe a function written by the programmer rather than included with the language - such usage has become obsolete since in structured programming virtually all program code consists of user defined functions" - would that be better? [[User:Amcguinn|Amcguinn]] 19:30, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
:I think that's a great suggestion. Maybe even massage what I wrote above a little as to why it's a big deal in these two cases...? I'd work on it, but I am out of town for a week starting in the morn... -- <span style="text-decoration: none;">[[User:Revragnarok|<font color="#696969">RevRagnarok</font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Revragnarok |Talk]] [[Special:Contributions/Revragnarok|Contrib]] [[User:Revragnarok/VandalismLog|Reverts]]</sup></span> 03:43, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
== [[Stored procedure]] ==
I'd been racking my brains to remember what I used to refer to database user-defined functions as, and I remembered "stored procedure". There's already an article there.
The options are:
* Make this page a redirect to [[Stored procedure]]
* Make it a brief account of user defined functions in different contexts, including a link to stored procedure
* Delete this altogether.
- [[User:Amcguinn|Amcguinn]] 10:18, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
| |||