Talk:Eiffel (programming language): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Line 40:
: Have one question -- what is "x." you've used there? I'm not guru in Eiffel, but can you explain this for me? Why should this be placed in the article if this isn't clear? May it is better to use ''simple'' examples? -- Kolesnikov P.A. (ru-wiki) 17 June 2006
:: I guess that the x. is a typo, it has no mean in Eiffel syntax. Whereas x is a reference to an instance of a class that inherits from TRAVERSABLE[G] (in the eiffel base). [[User:Momet|Momet]] 16:33, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
::: That's clear for me now that "x." has no meaning. But said "inherits form class in the Eiffel Base" -- you restricted that example only for those implementations with Eiffel Base. IMHO, that are ISE Eiffel and Visual Eiffel.
Am I right in that? And SmartEiffel hasn't this class at all.
 
== Reflective? ==