Revision as of 22:17, 7 February 2014 edit Mikhail Ryazanov (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 24,662 edits →Should the title be hyphenated? ← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:26, 8 February 2014 edit undo Glrx (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 29,708 edits →Should the title be hyphenated? Next edit →
Line 455: :::: It seems that this field uses a special variant of English. :–) Otherwise, I don't know how to explain phrases like "open source finite element software programs" (yes, without any hyphens and with mysterious "software programs", which probably means "computer programs" or "software") and why "Runge-Kutta", "Euler-Bernoulli" and "Navier-Stokes" are written with hyphens instead of dashes. — [[User:Mikhail Ryazanov\|Mikhail Ryazanov]] ([[User talk:Mikhail Ryazanov\|talk]]) 22:16, 7 February 2014 (UTC) ::::: Finite-element method is proper, but I don't think finite element method is improper. I'd prefer finite-element method, but the common usage is without the hypen. ::::: Endashes are the WP house style. [[Runge-Kutta]] and [[Navier-Stokes]] (hypen links) redirect to articles with endash between the names. [[User:Glrx\|Glrx]] ([[User talk:Glrx\|talk]]) 21:26, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Finite element method: Difference between revisions