Revision as of 07:30, 28 February 2014 edit Oskilla (talk \| contribs) 69 edits →Comparison with external compression schemes ← Previous edit		Revision as of 13:14, 22 March 2014 edit undo 183.83.56.193 (talk) →Comparison with general-purpose plain text compression schemes Next edit →
Line 15: \|date=2004-01-30 \|first=Doug \|last=Ewell \|accessdate=2008-06-13 \|format=PDF }}</ref> often dramatically so. SCSU does have the advantage that it can usefully compress texts that are only a few characters long, whereas most full-scale compressors need hundreds of bytes of data to break even against their own overhead. In [[Symbian OS]], SCSU is used even for Clipboard operations, e.g. Cut, Copy & Paste of small strings of text. ==See also==

Standard Compression Scheme for Unicode: Difference between revisions