Talk:SpaceX reusable launch system development program/GA1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Jamesx12345 (talk | contribs) sp |
Jamesx12345 (talk | contribs) + |
||
Line 19:
***If there is a local consensus to have it one way, I see no problem with that. [[User:Jamesx12345|James]]<sup>x</sup>[[User talk:Jamesx12345|12345]] 21:42, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
*"It said this was an approximation." - this single sentence looks a bit odd. It also makes the use of refs 6 and 7 a bit unclear.
**{{fixed
*I've tagged 4 dead links using Checklinks. There's also a {{cn}} needing fixed, but that might be covered by ref 46.
*"first stage is now being flight tested" - very liable to dating. Given that you and some other editors have focused on this article for a fair length of time, it should be OK, but an {{tl|As of}} or {{tl|Update after}} could be used.
Line 28:
*"24-story" - this needs a source, preferably for the height in metres. In terms of buildings, the spelling should be storey.
*"SpaceX made history in September 2013 when it relit" - "In September 2013, SpaceX successfully for the first time relit" - seems a bit promotional. My wording isn't great, it's just the "made history" that doesn't feel quite right.
*"for March 2014 at the earliest." - another ref needed. I'll stop referring to refs by number since they might change unpredictably as you add or move them.
*[[Transonic]] can be linked.
| |||