Talk:SpaceX reusable launch system development program/GA1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Jamesx12345 (talk | contribs) +2 more |
→Initial review punch list: respond |
||
Line 13:
***{{Yellow tick}}—Hey [[User:Jamesx12345|James]]. See what I said before (above) about the challenges of obtaining a WP-license-able photo, and let me know if you are okay with this for a GA review. The editor who provided me the rather strict interpretation of ''fair use'' and the WP license practices did allow that some other editors might not take as hard a line on it as he does. However, I've not gone and tried to pursue a consensus from a larger group on this. [[User:N2e|N2e]] ([[User talk:N2e|talk]]) 20:50, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
****I'm afraid I don't know much about image licensing. It doesn't actually need any images at all for the purpose of a GAR, but they do make it easier to understand. Ideally, somebody would pay for me to attend a launch and I'd take a few snaps :-) [[User:Jamesx12345|James]]<sup>x</sup>[[User talk:Jamesx12345|12345]] 21:34, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
*****Oh, that could work. We have a LOT of photos of the launches. Anytime they are from a US government leased facility, the USG takes lots of photos, and they are released under quite acceptable licenses. The problem is our EXTREMELY limited photoset from anything at all related to the reusable technology (e.g., Grasshopper v1.0 flying, or of the landing-over-water tests). These are private, SpaceX takes lots of photos; releases a very few to the press, but none with Creative Commons-acceptable licenses.
:::::So do you think we should just insert a photo of the rocket launching? (beyond the one we have in there now?) None of that is reusable tech tests etc. [[User:N2e|N2e]] ([[User talk:N2e|talk]]) 22:19, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
**Re: tightening up the prose: The article just went through a [[WP:GOCE]]. But one idea I had is that we could delete the following sentence from the second paragraph, as it is only summarizing details presented in the article: "Eight low-altitude flight tests were made in 2012 and 2013. The first booster return controlled-descent test from high-altitude was made in September 2013, and a second test is planned for March 2014.[2][3]" Would you think that would help? [[User:N2e|N2e]] ([[User talk:N2e|talk]]) 03:27, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
***I think so. Schedules seem like the kind of info best kept for the main body of the article.
| |||