Content deleted Content added
→Vote Results: Tsushima basin (Ulleung basin): added number to outcome |
|||
Line 242:
:Measuring the consensus and counting the votes can be two different things here. Finding the consensus is the most important thing here at Wikipedia, and the vote was merely a tool to discover the consensus. Clearly, there was NOT a 60% consensus during the voting. And the voting is finished already. What I'm saying is that despite the percentage being 57.9%, there should be somebody who voted for "Ulleung Basin" but will support "Tsushima Basin" as the consensus, with merely a 51% majority, therefore accepting it as the new status quo.... In other words, aside from the voting, a new consensus can arise from among the 19 voters, on what to do from here, and that consensus can indeed be over 60%.--[[User:Endroit|Endroit]] 17:14, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
===RFC comments===
FOr anyone participating in the [[WP:RFC|Request for comments]], please post you messages in this section. Please sign your somments with '''<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>'''. Thank you. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<font color="darkblue">日本穣</font>]]<sup>[[Help:Japanese|?]] · <small>[[User talk:Nihonjoe|<font color="blue">Talk</font>]] <font color="darkblue">to</font> [[User:Nihonjoe|Nihon]][[WP:JA|j]]o[[WP:EA|'''<font color="darkgreen">e</font>''']]</small></sup> 16:00, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
== Spellin/Grammar corrections ==
| |||