Revision as of 12:12, 9 July 2014 edit SMcCandlish (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors 203,717 edits rm. redundant wording ← Previous edit		Revision as of 12:16, 9 July 2014 edit undo SMcCandlish (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors 203,717 edits WP:SYNTH caveat Next edit →
Line 57: ==Conclusion== As this simple test case demonstrates, even sources that appear to be near-trivial in their brevity can often, if they are reliable, be used to source far more material than they seem capable of at first glance, especially if they relate (negatively or positively) to material in other sources (so long as [[WP:SYNTH]] is followed carefully). This remains true long after they are cited, since a newly "discovered" source may re-open a dynamic between the earlier, already-mined sources and the article as it evolves. ==Notes==

Help:How to mine a source: Difference between revisions