Computer game bot Turing test: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 06:43, 15 July 2014

Revision as of 18:28, 20 November 2015

Line 34:

The outcome of a bot that appears more human-like than a human player is possibly overstated, since in the tournament in which the bots succeeded, the average 'humanness' rating of the human players was only 41.4%.<ref>http://botprize.org/result.html</ref> This showcases some limits of this Turing Test, since the results demonstrate that human behaviour is more complicated and quantitative than was accounted for.<ref>{{Cite news|title=How did this game bot score higher than humans on a Turing Test?|date=October 1, 2012|last=Dvorsky|first=George|url=http://io9.com/5947796/how-can-a-game-bot-score-higher-than-humans-on-a-turing-test}}</ref> In light of this, the BotPrize competition organizers will increase the difficulty in upcoming years with new challenges, forcing competitors to improve their bots.<ref>{{Cite news|title=More human than human: AI game bots pass Turing Test|date=September 26, 2012|first=Darren|last=Quick|url=http://www.gizmag.com/turing-test-ut2004-botprize/24308/}}</ref>

It is also believed that methods and techniques developed for the Computer Game Bot Turing Test will be useful in fields other than video games, such as [[virtual training]] environments and in improving [[Human–robot interaction|robot-human interaction]].<ref>{{Cite news|title=Artificially Intelligent Game Bots Pass the Turing Test on Turing's Centenary|date=September 26, 21022012|url=http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/09/120926133235.htm}}</ref>

==Contrasts to the Turing Test==