Content deleted Content added
I think "diffuse" should be added to the table... |
|||
Line 152:
::If you go into edit the article you will see the words that I quoted about only adding tools with their own page. All the other additions link to Wikipedia articles. DiffMerge had an article which was deleted in August 2011 because there was no demonstrated notability. If you can provide citations demonstrating notability then you are welcome to create an article first. see [[WP:WTAF]]. I am not being "Rash", "Rude" nor am I on a "Power trip" so please could you keep your comments [[Wikipedia:Civility|Civil]] [[User:Vrenator|<span style="font-family: Papyrus"><font color="green">'''''Vrenator'''''</font></span>]] [[User talk:Vrenator|<span style="font-family: Papyrus"><font color ="green"><sup>talk</sup></font></span>]] 10:27, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=61 it's only in dev versions. [[Special:Contributions/212.29.231.179|212.29.231.179]] ([[User talk:212.29.231.179|talk]]) 09:24, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
That's an arbitrary rule not worth keeping.
"You can't mention anything here that doesn't have its own article" - How does that help this article to provide a broad overview of the available tools? A tool can be worth keeping on comparison tables, because it's worth being found and used, even if it doesn't merit a whole article of it's own. The notability threshold for an own article may not be reached, but it's still a useful tool, well executed, free and more noteworthy than some other tools on this page. I came here to explicitely compare DiffMerge's features to others and need to look for this information in the revision history - that's sad. [[User:RainyAfternoon|RainyAfternoon]] ([[User talk:RainyAfternoon|talk]]) 08:06, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
== diff, diff3 Max Supported File Size ==
| |||