Content deleted Content added
Victorianist (talk | contribs) |
Victorianist (talk | contribs) →Article nominated for deletion: new section |
||
Line 318:
:::::: I have no relationship to Sikuli. Here's how it came that I added it to the list. I work for a company and we need an automated, cross-platform GUI testing tool that is also open source. There is one on your (note that I say "your" and not "Wikipedia's" list that I was interested in, but a colleague pointed me toward another tool that I had never heard of and that was Sikuli. I thought I would at least put a link to it on the page. But it seems that any arm-chair enthusiast without a higher degree in anything thinks that they know better about what should appear in a Wikipedia entry. You keep fighting the good fight. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Victorianist|Victorianist]] ([[User talk:Victorianist|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Victorianist|contribs]]) 03:54, 2 August 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:::::: And also, I think you need to seriously edit this list. Most of the entries do not have citations, there's one redline link, and some of the others have some columns marked "unknown." I'll be cleaning up the list applying your own guidelines. [[User:Victorianist|Victorianist]] ([[User talk:Victorianist|talk]]) 03:58, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
== Article nominated for deletion ==
This article has been nominated for deletion before, in 2007 and the consensus at that time was that it should be deleted. The "criteria" of notability proposed in the talk page and in hidden comments in the article itself is that that each link should point to an already existing article on Wikipedia, but this does not establish notability. The list contains red links and none of the listed items points to verifiable sources or to sources that establish notability.
| |||