Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Object-oriented SQL: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 18:06, 23 August 2014

Revision as of 18:57, 23 August 2014

Line 10:

*: Also, where is it established that "Object-oriented SQL" is the same as "OSQL"? Databases do not seem to be your area of expertise. <font class="signature">— [[User:Kephir|Keφr]]</font> 16:50, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

***[http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=fFh2G9AeEgcC&pg=PA183 This source] does appear to say that OSQL is an abbreviation for Object-oriented SQL. It refers to "a prototype object oriented SQL language (OSQL)". [[User:James500|James500]] ([[User talk:James500|talk]]) 18:06, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

*'''Redirect''' to [[Object-oriented_programming#Object-orientation_and_databases]]. There isn't a single entity called "Object Oriented SQL", nor is it a particular technique that has been discussed in the peer-reviewed literature. Rather, this is simply a descriptive term that has been used across multiple software projects. For example, [[SQL:1999]] is [http://users.dcc.uchile.cl/~cgutierr/cursos/BD/standards.pdf "characterized as 'object-oriented SQL'"], ESQL2 is [http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=213178&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D213178 "an object-oriented SQL with F-Logic semantics"], UniSQL's SQIJX is an [http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=181552 "object-oriented SQL"], etc. Particular implementations may be notable (''e.g.'', [http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22IRIS+OSQL%22+&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5 IRIS OSQL]), but as best I can tell, the topic at hand is not. [[User:Lesser Cartographies|Lesser Cartographies]] ([[User talk:Lesser Cartographies|talk]]) 18:57, 23 August 2014 (UTC)