Revision as of 18:20, 6 July 2006 edit G026r (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 1,147 edits →Vandalism? ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:07, 28 September 2006 edit undo Donwithnoname (talk \| contribs) 213 edits Transgressive Literature? Next edit →
Line 19: I don't know enough about transgressive art to say for certain, but something about the edits of [[84.191.252.36]], [[84.191.219.75]], [[84.191.248.169]], [[84.191.222.184]], and [[84.191.216.189]] (Obviously all the same person, judging by the similar IPs and MO.) that just don't seem right. Anyone more knowledgable care to take a peek? -- [[User:G026r\|g026r]] 18:18, 6 July 2006 (UTC) :And nevermind, I've reverted the edits for the time being. I just noticed a few of them that made no sense (artists of the 90s influencing Throbbing Gristle?) that obviously imply vandalism. -- [[User:G026r\|g026r]] 18:20, 6 July 2006 (UTC) == Transgressive Literature? == Are Trainspotting, Fight Club and American Psycho actually considered transgressive literature? They don't seem nearly as 'transgressive' as the art of G. G. Allin, Kern, Zedd, etc.

Talk:Transgressive art: Difference between revisions