Oh comrade, I see you added something. I thought that last "LAST WARNING" was my last warning?
<!--LEAVE THE FOLLOWING SECTION ALONE!!-->{{/Talk}}<!--LEAVE THE PRECEDING SECTION ALONE!! ####################################################################################################
JOIN THE FIGHT! WIKIPEDIA IS COMMUNISM!
*****When editing, place newer messages on the BOTTOM!*****
This page is OPERATIONAL. You can start editing right after the "BEGIN" line.
<To Vandals: All vandalism will be dealt with SWIFTLY, so please don't waste your time.>
---------BEGIN▒FANGEN Sie an▒COMIENCE▒COMMENCEZ▒COMINCI▒COMECE▒ابدا▒始めなさい▒시작하세요▒开始-------->
== Your Userpage ==
Hey, it's no problem. It's part of what I do, I couldn't let that happen to your page could I? :) [[User:Yanksox|<font color="black">Yank</font>]][[User talk:Yanksox|<font color="red">sox</font>]] 02:18, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
== RFA thanks ==
[[Image:Where RFA ty.png]]
== A belated thank you ==
Hi there:
I've been off Wikipedia for about a week due to illness and work (and procrastinating on thank yous ;-) ), but I wanted to thank you for your support on [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/DLJessup|my RfA]], and for pointing out that I needed to have my e-mail turned on if I wanted to be an administrator. As evidenced by my bid's defeat, I probably need to communicate a bit more on Wikipedia.
Anyway, thank you very much. I'm sorry to be writing this when you're on a wikibreak.
— [[User:DLJessup|DLJessup]] ([[User talk:DLJessup|talk]]) 19:37, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
----
You've violated the 3 edits rule to the George Washington page and YOU will be reported.--[[User:Gbdill|Gbdill]] 02:06, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
:Reverting your vandalism does not fall under 3RR.<strong> [[User:GHe|<font color="blue">G</font>]].[[User talk:GHe|<font color="#666666">H</font>]][[User:GHe/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]]</strong> 02:07, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
== Block of Tha Bomba Mann lol and stuff like that ==
Hello,
Just a small request. Could you in the future link to the arbcom or whatever case when you're putting the arbcom-blocked template on user page ?
Users blocked like that often complain on IRC and it's easier for the people who are on IRC if the case documentation can be found without too much trouble.
Thanks in advance :-) [[User:Taw|Taw]] 00:54, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
OK, that was confusing, as technically there's no such thing as "ruling of administrators", so I read it (I'm a bit sleepy right now, it's 03:11 here) that it's some ArbCom case.
Anyway, after some quick consultation on IRC, I modified the template so it includes documentation link.
So now it should be used like <nowiki>{{subst:indefblockeduser|Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Blockeduser}}</nowiki> or <nowiki>{{subst:indefblockeduser|User talk:Blockeduser}}</nowiki> or something like that. I think that will make people's lives a bit easier on #wikipedia-en :-) [[User:Taw|Taw]] 01:11, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
==Barnstar==
[[Image:Barnstar of Reversion2.png|center|frame|For protecting [[University of Texas at Austin]] against vandalism, I award you the ''RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar''. Thank you! [[User:Johntex|Johntex]]]]
|