National Development Programme in Computer Aided Learning: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m clean up, added orphan, Empty section (1), uncategorised, underlinked tags, typo(s) fixed: full time → full-time using AWB |
No edit summary |
||
Line 4:
}}
The '''National Development Programme in Computer Aided Learning''' (NDPCAL) was the earliest government funded education programme in the UK that explored the use of computers for teaching. It was first proposed to the [[Department of Education and Science]] by the National Council for Educational Technology in 1969, [[Richard Hooper (civil servant)|Richard Hooper]] was appointed its Director and operated with a small central team administered by the Council for Educational Technology . It ran from 1973 to 1977, spending £2.5M to support some 35 projects covering a range of subjects in schools, colleges, universities, industrial and military training.<ref>Hooper R., 1975, Two years On, National Development Programme in Computer Aided Learning, Report of the Director, London: CET</ref>
==Origins==
During the 1960s and early 1970s various innovative projects in the USA and the UK using mainframe and mini-computers began to develop the field of Computer Aided Learning and there was much debate about its value and effectiveness.<ref>Annett J. and Duke J.,1970, Proceedings of a Seminar on Computer Based Learning Systems, London:NCET</ref> The National Council for Educational Technology provided advice to government in 1969 for a national development programme<ref>http://www.edtechhistory.org.uk/history/the_1960s/orig_NCET.html</ref>
It was four years later that the Department for Education and Science (DES) following much discussion amongst the interested departments and an intervening general election, announced the approval by the Secretary of State ([[Mrs Thatcher]]) to a 'national development programme in computer assisted learning' in a DES press release dated 23 May 1972.
Following the announcement of the Programme the post of Director was advertised.and [[Richard Hooper (civil servant)|Richard Hooper]], BBC Senior Producer in the Faculty of Educational Studies at the Open University was selected.
Line 38:
Stage 4 - Assimilation and Dissemination - national funding is being phased out and the institution has taken ownership with other new institutions taking it up.
About half the project funds were spent on projects in universities and polytechnics, about one-sixth of the project funds was spent on schools based projects and the rest on military and industrial training. Some of the projects are listed below. <ref>For a full list
===Computer Based Learning Project, Leeds University===▼
Director: Dr. P.R. Smith Faculty of Engineering, Computer Assisted Teaching Unit, Queen Mary College.▼
Director: Dr. P.B. Ayscough Dept. of Physical Chemistry, The University of Leeds.▼
===Computers in the Undergraduate Science Curriculum===▼
Director: Dr. W.Tagg, Advisory Unit for Computer Based Education▼
▲
▲* Computer Assisted Learning in Engineering Sciences Director: Dr. P.R. Smith Faculty of Engineering, Computer Assisted Teaching Unit, Queen Mary College.
▲* Computer Assisted Learning in Chemistry Director: Dr. P.B. Ayscough Dept. of Physical Chemistry, The University of Leeds.
▲
▲* Hertfordshire Computer Managed Mathematics in Schools Director: Dr. W.Tagg, Advisory Unit for Computer Based Education
==Evaluation==
Evaluation was an important part of NDPCAL's approach. It set up two independent evaluations as well as building in evaluation through its regular project reviews and assessments. The two independent evaluations were an educational evaluation carried out by the University of East Anglia and a financial evaluation by Peat, Marwick, Mitchell and Co.
===Educational Evaluation===
This was carried out by Barry MacDonald and a team from the [[University of East Anglia]] running a three year evaluation project - UNCAL ( 'Understanding Computer Assisted Learning). MacDonald<ref>MacDonald B., 1977, The Educational Evaluation of NDPCAL, British Journal of Educational Technology, 8-3 p176-189.</ref> reports some findings about CAL in general:
# It is the versatility of the computer as an aid that assures its educational future
Line 105 ⟶ 85:
# Large scale applications of CAL require full-time staff and regular computer time.
==References==
|