Revision as of 10:05, 6 November 2014 edit Serv49 (talk \| contribs) 15 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 18:15, 23 December 2014 edit undo GeneCallahan (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 773 edits →Fundamental pattern category Next edit →
Line 95: ::: Err, I guess I don't agree with [[User:dmyersturnbull\|dmyersturnbull]] (and apparently I can not read). Anyways, the reference above is worth looking at if you are pursuing this. There is literature where people try to dissect the ''universal'' nature of a pattern. As with the multiple language example above, an excess of things named patterns can dilute as well. [[User:Bpringlemeir\|Bpringlemeir]] ([[User talk:Bpringlemeir\|talk]]) 01:48, 16 July 2010 (UTC) ::: "Encapsulation and inheritance are general directions for structuring code..." In other words, patterns?! This looks like the very definition of a pattern! [[User:GeneCallahan\|GeneCallahan]] ([[User talk:GeneCallahan\|talk]]) == Why is Factory not listed? ==

Talk:Software design pattern: Difference between revisions