Content deleted Content added
→Review: ticking those done. Although even I can follow the proof in the uncited para, not convinced it doesn't need a ref |
|||
Line 18:
;Lead
* See my initial comment on the nature of the controversy
* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Wikilinking part of the bolded part of the lead sentence is discouraged by [[WP:LEAD]].
* Leaving two unanswered questions is not a sufficient summary of the article content on them
* There is a lot in the article about the history of the idea (whole section on development) but absent from the lead.
;The article
* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] "Note how Cantor's second theorem..." There is a [[WP:WTW]] issue here.
* "...Cantor's second theorem separates the constructive content of his work from the proof by contradiction..." I think it needs stating explicitly that the second theorem is the constructive content (if indeed that is the case)
* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] [[Transcendental number]] should be wikilinked. It is linked later in the article, but that is not the first mention.
* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] The paragraph beginning "The first half of this remark..." is uncited. At the very least it needs a cite for "Cantor...probably" which is making a [[theory of mind]] statement about Cantor's motives.
;The proofs
Line 50:
;Images
* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Likenesses of Cantor and other major mathematicians in this story are available. Why not use them in this article?
[[User:Spinningspark|<b style="background:#FAFAD2;color:#C08000">Spinning</b>]][[User talk:Spinningspark|<b style="color:#4840A0">Spark</b>]] 16:04, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
:: Hello. Thank you for working on this. I've done a few edits today and I'll be back. [[User:Michael Hardy|Michael Hardy]] ([[User talk:Michael Hardy|talk]]) 00:10, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
| |||