Revision as of 20:56, 7 January 2015 edit BenKuykendall (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 8,390 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:19, 7 January 2015 edit undo Gene93k (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers 468,367 edits Listing at WP:DELSORT under Computing (FWDS) Next edit →
Line 9: '''Delete''' – Is (was?) a project at the University of Edinburgh. A test of programming languages is whether they are used by anyone other than their creators, and this one doesn't seem to be, aside from one German dissertation.That might be because it appears to use a rather esoteric functional programming language ([[OCaml]]). Microsoft has a component called [[Language Integrated Query\|LINQ]] that is similar, and they are sometimes mentioned together, but LINQ works with [[Visual Studio]], so there is no competition there. If we kept it, it would be only for the sake of completeness. – [[User:Margin1522\|Margin1522]] ([[User talk:Margin1522\|talk]]) 20:44, 5 January 2015 (UTC) '''Delete'''. I could not find any significant third party coverage, a requirement for notability per [[WP:SIGCOV]]. [[User:Piboy51\|Piboy51]] ([[User talk:Piboy51\|talk]]) 20:56, 7 January 2015 (UTC) :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Computing\|list of Computing-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k\|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k\|talk]]) 23:19, 7 January 2015 (UTC)</small>

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Links (programming language): Difference between revisions