Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/GamerGate/Proposed decision: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→NorthBySouthBaranof: (remedies): support 4.1, mark 4.2 second choice. |
→TaraInDC admonished: to be honest, I'm not even sure what I meant by that comment. (strike rationale, vote unchanged) |
||
Line 1,352:
:#[[User:Beeblebrox|Beeblebrox]] ([[User talk:Beeblebrox|talk]]) 19:53, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
:# Extremely weak support. Their behavior probably did warrant it, although the benefit of sanctioning them after they left is limited. ''[[User:NativeForeigner|NativeForeigner]]'' <sup>[[User talk:NativeForeigner|Talk]]</sup> 07:26, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
:# <s>Would support if 6.1 were not currently passing, so vacuous support.</s> '''[[User:LFaraone|L]]<font color="darkgreen">[[User talk:LFaraone|Faraone]]</font>''' 18:47, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
:# Second choice. <font color="#cc6600">[[User:David Fuchs|Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs]]</font><sup><small>(<font color="#ff6600">[[User talk:David Fuchs|talk]]</font>)</small></sup> 19:54, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
:# Iff the topic ban does not pass. [[User:Timotheus Canens|T. Canens]] ([[User talk:Timotheus Canens|talk]]) 09:52, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
| |||