Institutional analysis and development framework: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 03:14, 2 February 2015

Revision as of 07:17, 2 February 2015

Line 3:

{{technical|date=January 2015}}

}}

'''The Institutional Analysis and Development Framework''' (''commonly known as IAD'') is a [[Systematic_samplingSystematic sampling|systematic method]] to collect policy analysis functions similar to [[analytical technique|analytic technique]] commonly used in [[Physical science|physical]] and [[social science]]s and understand the ways an institution can operate and change over a period of time.<ref name=indiana>{{cite web|author1=Michael D. McGinnis|title=An Introduction to IAD and the Language of the Ostrom Workshop: A Simple Guide to a Complex Framework for the Analysis of Institutions and Their Development|url=http://poseidon01.ssrn.com/delivery.php?ID=751119001100098006090092064001065006034048031046008017077070065006068117100125067022058117006035008099001118111016111092122095106078039042042125118092118002001030086033030046005106074116117000084089121084&EXT=pdf&TYPE=1|publisher=[[Indiana University]]|accessdate=2 February 2015}}</ref><ref name=mason>{{cite book|author1=Margaret M. Polski|author2=Elinor Ostrom|title=An Institutional Framework for Policy Analysis and Design|url=https://mason.gmu.edu/~mpolski/documents/PolskiOstromIAD.pdf|accessdate=1 February 2015}}</ref> It was developed by [[Elinor Ostrom]], an American [[political scientist]], also known as the first woman to receive the [[Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences]] in 2009.<ref>[[Elinor Ostrom|Ostrom, Elinor]]. (1990) ''Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action''. New York: Cambridge University.</ref>

[[File:IAD framework diagram.png|thumb|400px|IAD framework diagram]]

The Institutional Analysis and Development Framework views institutions as human-made system within which individual choices take place and which configure consequences of the respective choices.<ref name=indiana/><ref>{{cite web|author1=Charlotte Hess|author2=Elinor Ostrom|title=Ideas, Artifacts, and Facilities: Information as a Common-Pool Resource|url=http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1276&context=lcp|publisher=Duke University School of Law|accessdate=30 January 2015|page=22}}</ref>{{verification failed verification|date=February 2015}} According to Ostrom, IAD is a "multi-level conceptual map" with which one could zoom in and out of particular hierarchical parts of the regularised interactions in an established social system. It assumes a context to the particular interaction in which the general network of regular actors would be analysed, the particular rules-in-use, and the particular common outcome that they hope to achieve. In the traditional analysis of [[Common-pool_resourcepool resource|common pool arrangements]], the common outcome would be a particular resource which the actors draw on.<ref name="Understanding Institutional Diversity">{{cite book|author=Elinor Ostrom|title=Understanding Institutional Diversity|date=2009|publisher=Princeton University Press|___location=Princeton|isbn=9781400831739|url=http://press.princeton.edu/chapters/s8085.pdf|accessdate=30 January 2015}}</ref> IAD defines institutions as, "shared concepts used by humans in repetitive situations organized by rules, norms, and strategies".<ref>{{cite web|author1=Xavier Basurto|author2=Gordon Kingsley|author3=Kelly McQueen|author4=Mshadoni Smith|author5=Christopher M. Weible|title=A SYSTEMATIC APPROACH TO INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS: APPLYING CRAWFORD AND OSTROM’S GRAMMATICAL SYNTAX|url=http://www.indiana.edu/~workshop/publications/materials/W08-33%20Draft.pdf|publisher=[[Indiana University]]|accessdate=2 February 2015}}</ref>

The IAD framework helps to perceive complex social phenomenon by dividing them into smaller pieces of practically understandable function.<ref name=indiana/> The important aspect of IAD framework is that outcome is influenced by the institutional arrangements created by local actors in a given context.<ref>{{cite journal|author1=Krister Andersson|title=Understanding decentralized forest governance: an application of the institutional analysis and development framework|journal=Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy|url=http://sspp.proquest.com/archives/vol2iss1/0507-010.andersson.html|accessdate=2 February 2015}}</ref>

Charlotte Hess noted researcher on [[Common-pool resource]],<ref>{{cite web|title=SelectedWorks of Charlotte Hess|url=http://works.bepress.com/charlotte_hess/|accessdate=1 February 2015}}</ref>, said that the repositories at her academic institutions resembled commons in respects to the incentives for contributing information and the sharing of network capacity in the cases where information resource is in high demand.<ref name="Charlotte Hess">{{cite web|author1=Charlotte Hess|title=The Virtual CPR: The Internet as a Local and Global Common Pool Resource|url=http://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/dlc/bitstream/handle/10535/234/iascp-95-II.pdf?sequence=1|publisher=Indiana University|accessdate=30 January 2015|pages=5-65–6|date=May 1995}}</ref>

Before Ostrom passed away in 2010, she further elaborated the possible rules to analyze a particular action situation.<ref name="Understanding Institutional Diversity"/>

Line 34:

== References ==

{{Reflist}}

==Further reading==

* {{cite web|author1=Elinor Ostrom|title=INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS AND DEVELOPMENT: ELEMENTS OF THE FRAMEWORK IN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE|url=http://www.eolss.net/Sample-Chapters/C04/E6-99A-34.pdf|accessdate=2 February 2015}}

* {{cite book|title=Historical Developments and Theoretical Approaches in Sociology.|date=2010|publisher=Eolss Publishers|___location=Ramsey|isbn=9781848263321}}

[[Category:Social sciences]]