Revision as of 22:50, 19 February 2015 edit Gene93k (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers 468,367 edits Listing at WP:DELSORT under Software (FWDS) ← Previous edit		Revision as of 07:20, 21 February 2015 edit undo Opabinia regalis (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 16,306 edits →Intentional Programming: keep Next edit →
Line 8: :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Computing\|list of Computing-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k\|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k\|talk]]) 22:50, 19 February 2015 (UTC)</small> :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software\|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k\|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k\|talk]]) 22:50, 19 February 2015 (UTC)</small> *'''Keep'''. I see what you mean, about both the article and the idea, and it suggests potential [[WP:COI]] issues if the company is actively using this article in their recruitment materials. But I think this is [[WP:N\|notable in the Wikipedia sense]] - coverage in multiple reliable sources - even though it hasn't really taken off as a concept. [[User:Opabinia regalis\|Opabinia regalis]] ([[User talk:Opabinia regalis\|talk]]) 07:20, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intentional programming: Difference between revisions