Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intentional programming: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Intentional Programming: keep |
Darklink259 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 9:
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 22:50, 19 February 2015 (UTC)</small>
*'''Keep'''. I see what you mean, about both the article and the idea, and it suggests potential [[WP:COI]] issues if the company is actively using this article in their recruitment materials. But I think this is [[WP:N|notable in the Wikipedia sense]] - coverage in multiple reliable sources - even though it hasn't really taken off as a concept. [[User:Opabinia regalis|Opabinia regalis]] ([[User talk:Opabinia regalis|talk]]) 07:20, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
I would argue that this is only a concept of a concept, that the so-called paradigm, since it doesn't seem to be described in any detail, doesn't actually exist. I guess this could be a "programming concept", or something like that, but I don't think it's correct for it to be called a "paradigm".[[User:Darklink259|Darklink259]] ([[User talk:Darklink259|talk]]) 08:40, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
| |||